Lindsay Clancy trial live updates: Defense attorney’s aggressive questioning draws gasps as Clancy’s lawyer lays into pyschiatrist: ‘This is not funny’
Editor’s note: Coverage of this case is disturbing. Scroll with discretion.
PLYMOUTH, Mass. — Lindsay Clancy was back in court Monday morning for the fifth week of her high-profile murder trial for strangling her three young kids.
The case is expected to wind down this week with closing arguments potentially slated to begin as early as Monday or Tuesday. The jury could start their deliberations this week.
Prosecutors are currently putting on a rebuttal case to counter defense testimony that the 36-year-old Duxbury, Massachusetts mother should not be held criminally responsible because she was allegedly in the throes of severe postpartum psychosis and hearing voices when she carried out the slayings.
Psychiatrist Dr. Avram Mack – who began testifying Friday as the first rebuttal witness – has claimed that Clancy wasn’t suffering from psychosis and she knew that what she was doing was wrong.
Monday morning, Clancy’s lawyer, Kevin Reddington, began cross-examining Mack seeking to discredit his expertise in testifying about criminal responsibility.
Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer lays into psychiatrist: ‘What are you smiling for? This is not funny’
By
Georgia Worrell
and
Priscilla DeGregory
Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer just laid into psychiatrist Dr. Avram Mack for smirking while he was testifying about different types of mental evaluations.
“What are you smiling for? This is not funny, sir,” defense attorney Kevin Reddington said to Mack.
Prosecutors objected and the judge sustained the objection.
Reddington also accused Mack of having a confirmatory bias by the fact he was hired by prosecutors to evaluate Clancy’s criminal responsibility.
“You have a confirmatory bias … you had read all this material, you’ve spoken to prosecutors, you talked to [psychiatrist] Kirk Heilburn about how you’re going to go in and evaluate Lindsay Clancy right?” Reddington said.
“No,” Mack responded.
Reddington then asked Mack how much he makes as a forensic psychiatrist.
“It ranges… it can be several hundreds of thousands of dollars, it can be a few,” Mack said.
The jurors have been staring intently during the tense exchange between Reddington and Mack.
Courtroom reacts to defense attorney’s aggressive questioning
By
Georgia Worrell
and
Priscilla DeGregory
Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer, Kevin Reddington, drew laughs and gasps from people in the courtroom during his aggressive questioning of a psychiatrist.
Redding grilled Dr. Avram Mack about the fact that he only evaluated Clancy years after she killed her kids.
“There was a significant passage of time between January 2023 and when you saw her a few months ago,” Reddington said.
He then began to ask Mack about where he stayed in Massachusetts when he conducted the exams in April 2026.
“Did you stay in a hotel, in a van, where did you stay?” Reddington asked, drawing chuckles from the gallery.
Mack said he stayed in a private home and Reddington asked if another psychiatrist who joined Mack for the evaluations also stayed at the private home.
“I don’t know,” Mack answered, to gasps from courtroom attendees.
“You don’t know?” Reddington said.
“He didn’t stay there, that’s for sure,” Mack said.
Scenes as trial starts back up Monday
By
Post Staff
Lindsay Clancy appears in court at fifth week of her murder trial, as case winds down
By
Priscilla DeGregory
and
Georgia Worrell
Lindsay Clancy is sitting at the defense table wearing a pink blouse and her long brown hair flowing down her back at the fifth week of her high-profile murder trial, as the case winds down.
To her right was a grey box that had words of affirmation on it, including “Laugh lots … smile.”
When Judge William Sullivan greeted her this morning, she responded “Good morning, Your Honor.”
This is the fifth week of trial of her murder case.
Psychiatrist is back on the witness stand
By
Priscilla DeGregory
Psychiatrist Dr. Avram Mack is back on the witness stand as Lindsay Clancy’s lawyer, William Sullivan, has begun his cross-examination.
Mack on Friday told the jury he thought that Clancy was aware of the wrongfulness of strangling her three kids and therefore should be held criminally liable for their murders.
But Sullivan asked Mack how many times he’d testified regarding criminal responsibility in the past.
Read more Electrician trapped for hours in 130-foot-high sign had recorded ‘final words’ for wife and kids
“One or two times,” the psychiatrist answered.